JMIR formative research
2026-03-27
Wydajność noszonego pulsoksymetru podczas kontrolowanej indukcji hipoksji: badanie walidacyjne instrumentu
Performance of Wearable Pulse Oximetry During Controlled Hypoxia Induction: Instrument Validation Study.
Recenzja AI
Cel badania
Celem badania była ocena dokładności Apple Watch Series 7 i klinicznego pulsoksymetru Masimo MightySat Rx w warunkach hipoksemii oraz zbadanie wpływu szybkości desaturacji tlenu na błąd pomiaru.
Metoda
Przeprowadzono analizę porównawczą odczytów saturacji tlenowej z pulsoksymetrów Masimo MightySat Rx i Apple Watch Series 7 z odczytami saturacji tlenowej krwi tętniczej uzyskanymi z analizatora gazów krwi.
Wyniki
Oba urządzenia miały tendencję do zawyżania saturacji tlenu, a dokładność spadała znacząco podczas hipoksemii, z większym błędem w przypadku Apple Watch Series 7.
Znaczenie dla praktyki
Wyniki sugerują ostrożność w interpretacji wartości saturacji tlenowej z tych urządzeń w codziennej praktyce klinicznej, szczególnie w przypadku pacjentów z ryzykiem hipoksemii.
Abstrakt oryginalny
BACKGROUND: Oxygen saturation is a crucial metric used for monitoring patients with lung disease or respiratory illness who are at risk of hypoxemia (low blood oxygen saturation). Early and accurate identification of abnormal oxygen saturation is important for these patients, who may develop significant desaturation and hypoxemia symptoms during their daily activities. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to evaluate the accuracy of Apple Watch Series 7 and a clinical-grade pulse oximeter, Masimo MightySat Rx, under hypoxemia and to assess whether measurement error is influenced by the oxygen desaturation rate (ODR). METHODS: We calculated the ODR of each measurement and conducted a comparative analysis of the displayed oxygen saturation readings from both the Masimo MightySat Rx finger pulse oximeter and Apple Watch Series 7 with arterial blood oxygen saturation (SaO2) readings obtained from a blood gas analyzer. RESULTS: Both the Masimo MightySat Rx pulse oximeter and the Apple Watch Series 7 tended to overestimate oxygen saturation. The pulse oximeter readings were more likely to fall within 2% of the acceptable (as specified by Masimo) peripheral oxygen saturation (SpO₂) error range than the Apple Watch (49.03% vs 32.14%). Notably, both devices had limitations under low oxygen saturation levels (<88%), with an accuracy root mean square difference (Arms) of 3.52% (95% CI 3.18%-3.86%) and 5.82% (95% CI 5.32%-6.31%) for the Masimo MightySat Rx and Apple Watch Series 7, respectively. Among the blood oxygen measurements taken during a high ODR (ie, ≥2% SpO2 per minute), which is a rate clinically correlated with sleep apnea, the Arms increased slightly by 0.75% for the Masimo MightySat Rx and decreased by 0.28% for the Apple Watch Series 7. CONCLUSIONS: Both devices consistently overestimated SpO2, with accuracy declining notably during hypoxemia. The Apple Watch Series 7 mean bias suggests a likelihood of missing instances of hypoxemia, particularly at arterial oxygen saturation values below but close to 88%. Both the Apple Watch Series 7 and Masimo MightySat Rx exhibited Arms values exceeding the US Food and Drug Administration threshold under conditions of hypoxemia. While past studies have implicated high ODRs in increasing measurement error, we found no statistically significant relationship between ODR and measurement error for either device. Overall, our findings of SpO2 overestimation and high Arms values underscore the need for caution when interpreting oxygen saturation values from these devices. The small sample size and limited diversity in skin tone and age restrict the generalizability of our findings. Future studies should include larger and more diverse populations to evaluate the performance of wearable-based pulse oximetry.