JAMA network open
2026-07-01
Rehabilitacja poznawcza i wyniki funkcjonalne w przypadku zaburzeń poznawczych związanych z long COVID: randomizowane badanie kliniczne
Cognitive Rehabilitation and Functional Outcomes in Long COVID-Related Cognitive Impairment: A Randomized Clinical Trial.
Recenzja AI
Cel badania
Celem badania była ocena skuteczności rehabilitacji poznawczej w poprawie osiągania celów oraz wyników poznawczych i klinicznych u osób z zaburzeniami poznawczymi związanymi z long COVID.
Metoda
Badanie przeprowadzono jako wieloośrodkowe, jednoślepe, z randomizacją uczestników do grupy rehabilitacji poznawczej lub standardowego leczenia, z zastosowaniem 10 sesji indywidualnych prowadzonych przez przeszkolonego badacza.
Wyniki
Wyniki wykazały, że uczestnicy w grupie rehabilitacji poznawczej osiągnęli znacząco wyższe wyniki w zakresie osiągania celów po 3 miesiącach w porównaniu do grupy standardowego leczenia, a efekt ten był utrzymany po 6 miesiącach.
Znaczenie dla praktyki
Wyniki badania sugerują, że spersonalizowana rehabilitacja poznawcza może znacząco poprawić jakość życia osób z long COVID w Polsce, co może wpłynąć na rozwój programów rehabilitacyjnych w tym zakresie.
Abstrakt oryginalny
IMPORTANCE: Cognitive impairment is common in long COVID and severely affects daily life, with no proven treatments to date. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the ability of cognitive rehabilitation (CR) to improve goal attainment, cognitive, and clinical outcomes in individuals with cognitive impairment as part of long COVID. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: This multicenter, single-blind, 2-arm, parallel-group randomized clinical trial was conducted at 3 sites in England between February 2023 and March 2024. Participants were adults aged 30 to 60 years with prior COVID-19 infection and objective cognitive impairment (≥1 SD below age norm in ≥2 cognitive domains). A sample size of 88 participants (44:44) was required to detect a conservative effect of 0.7 on the goal attainment score at 3 months. INTERVENTIONS: Participants were randomized (1:1) to CR or treatment as usual (TAU). CR consisted of 10 individual 1-hour sessions conducted once per week with a trained researcher, applying evidence-based strategies to 3 individually selected, personally meaningful functional goals. TAU was variable, with most participants having access to specialist memory clinics. MAIN OUTCOME AND MEASURES: The primary outcome consisted of participant-reported goal-attainment scores at 3 months after randomization measured by the Bangor Goal-Setting Interview. Analysis was conducted on an intention-to-treat basis using multilevel mixed-effects models with 2-sided 95% CIs and 5% significance. RESULTS: A total of 78 participants (24 male [30.8%] and 54 female [69.2%]; mean [SD] age, 47.3 [7.2] years) were randomized, including 38 individuals in CR and 40 individuals in TAU groups. At 3 months after randomization, goal attainment was significantly greater in the CR compared with the TAU group (adjusted mean difference, 2.88 [95% CI, 2.03-3.73]; P < .001; Cohen d = 1.57), with CR providing a large and clinically meaningful treatment effect. This was sustained at 6 months, with a lower effect size (adjusted mean difference, 1.72 [95% CI, 0.86-2.57]; P < .001; Cohen d = 0.91). CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: In this study, individualized, goal-oriented CR led to significant and sustained improvements in goal attainment in people with long COVID-related cognitive impairment. These findings may guide and inform the provision of CR treatments and services for people living with long COVID. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT05731570.
Źródło
JAMA network open
2026-07-01
DOI: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2026.20687
PMID: 42384384
PubMed Pełny tekst